Monday, May 5, 2014

Should electronics be used in class rooms?


            It is controversial on whether or not phones and other electronics should be allowed in school. With the high increase of technology intelligence, electronics in school would be a much better alternative than using outdated textbooks. Most textbooks today lack the information that students can simply search up on their phones, iPads, or tablets. Young people are growing up in societies where technology involves everyone; it is a common knowledge we are all coming about. “Instead of spending time and energy making sure students do not bring them to school, we should be investing that same energy into showing them how to use them properly” (Edubabbling 2014). People often take advantage of the free access to the wide variety of information we can attain just through our phones. Electronics should be allowed in the classroom for emergencies, faster easy research access and better information. It is just being the path to a more intelligent future.
Details:
            Today looking at the news and other surroundings, it is becoming more dangerous for everyone to be in public. There are a lot of natural disasters happening and lots of stories of strangers finding their ways into schools and this is very dangerous for students and their lives. With the past events such as Columbine and the Sandy Hooks shootings, coming to school often seems scary if there is not enough security. In schools we are not allowed to have our phones and are just to rely on the teachers. But in some cases, if something happens to the teacher there is no other way to contact families. “You will be better prepared to safely reunite your family and loved ones during an emergency if you think ahead, and communicate with others in advance” (Ready.gov 2012). Everyone has the fear of losing contact with his or her families in case of any emergency. Having phones in class for this reason will ensure the families that the students is okay or to let the outsiders know what is going on.
            Textbooks often tend to lack information that students need. They do have very useful information but there is always better and more helpful knowledge on the Internet. We use the Internet everyday for our small, quick, searching and social media. Information is always found on the Internet because of how much information we put out there. “The politics of the matter aside, the demonstrates the power of thought when it is articulated on the Internet today. It has the power to transcend the obstacles that offline communication faces” (Chrling 2011). With Web 2.0 rising, we are open to more opportunity of information.
            Using the Internet also allows faster searches. Web 2.0 is a better and faster tool everyone uses that advances more and more each day. “Examples of Web 2.0 include social networking sites, blogs, wikis, folksonomies, video sharing sites, hosted services, Web applications, and mashups” (Wikipedia 2014). There is so much more options to finding information besides a textbook in a better way than what a textbook can give students. Growing up in a technological society, it can appear to be easier to learn to type, text, and use other concepts of using electronics to educate us. Using the Internet is much faster and can help organizations and businesses work together better, give knowledge, and also improve on social structure. The Internet does not only provide faster searches, they also provide information on social media, news, and others. “According to some Internet experts, with Web 3.0 you’ll be able to sit back and let the Internet do all the work for you” (Strickland 2008). Using Internet could be helpful with gathering much information that is provided.
Conclusion:
            Electronics being allowed in schools will be very beneficial because it will allow better access to information we need in studies. The Internet has a lot more resources than an outdated textbook can give us. The youth is raised being able to use such technology to do quick searches. There is always the situation where there can be in an emergency and a student will need to contact their parents in case a teacher is incapable of doing so. Our phones, tablets, and iPads are very useful to our lives and the technology it brings us can often be taken advantage of. If phones are allowed in school, we can be taught all of the opportunities we have to educating ourselves (Wikipedia 2014).
 
Should electronics be used in classrooms? There are several arguments debating whether or not electronic devices should be used in classrooms. Schools have restricted their policies on the use of electronics during school due to distractions in learning for students. Although there are cons in the use of devices there are also pros as well. Now that technology is advancing and the Internet is becoming more mobile, the policy of electronics can change into this new age of the 21 century. Electronics provide a safe way of security then ever before.
Knew Knowledge: I never even thought that this concept would ever be considered due to the past policies of using a device in class.
Prior Knowledge: Now, a senior in High School I understand and obey the rules of keeping my phone in my locker. I always thought that the reason was because it serves as a distraction to the classroom, but always wondered, if an emergency is to happen what can students do in order to be safe if they’re individually at risk of danger. Electronics such as phones can be used to obtain information and used to cheat on tests but the teachers can suspect if they are really using it or not. Another way is through textbooks as stated in our essay, “Textbooks often tend to lack information that students need. They do have very useful information but there is always better and more helpful knowledge on the Internet. We use the Internet everyday for our small, quick, searching and social media. Information is always found on the Internet because of how much information we put out there”. Overall Electronics provide information, safety, and update of the 21st century future development.
Clarity: What will electronics in classrooms look like five years from now? 
 
Works Cited

Meador, Derrick. “Should Students Be Allowed To Use Cell Phones At School?”. Edubabbling.com. 2013. Web. 1 May 2014. < http://www.edubabbling.com/should-students-be-allowed-to-use-cell-phones-at-school/>

Ready.gov. “School Emergency Plan”. Ready.gov. 2012. Web. 1 May 2014. 
< http://www.ready.gov/school-emergency-plans >

Chrling. “Information Sharing on the Internet is Changing Our Society”. Chrling. 2011. Web. 1 May 2014.
 <http://www.ohrling.com/2011/02/information-sharing-on-the-internet-is-
changing-our-social-behavior/>

Wikipedia. “Web 2.0”. Web 2.0. 2014. Web. 1 May 2014 .
< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0>

Strickland, Johnathan. “How Web 3.0 Will Work”. HowStuffWorks. 2008. Web. 1 May
2014. <http://computer.howstuffworks.com/web-302.htm >

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Merging with machines


 Introduction:
Each decade, several scientists have tried to predict when the world will end or what the future will bring. Since the idea of Ray Kureweil ‘s singularity, movies of robots and nanotechnology have given the impression that robots will merge with human beings and take over the world. Technology has been increasing and becoming more advanced over the years and with each step we are getting closer to the future. The government is improving our economy and also making it more advanced in terms of easy labor through technology, replacing jobs to make products more proficient and faster then manual labor. Some are in fear that by 2100 machines will merge with humans and completely rip us of our human characteristics; these fears will affect society and have a negative impact. Machines merging with humans will have a negative impact by, Nanotechnology turning everyday materials into deadly weapons, Social development rising twice as much between now and 2050, Chips will be implanted into soldier’s brains to enhance their thought process, and computers will be built from enzymes and DNA molecules rather than silicon.

Details:

According to Ian Morris “by the year 2100 our planet will have changed out of all recognition”(Morris Oct. 2010). The year 2100 is the expected year that technology will be so advanced that people of the past won’t be able to recognize it. The arrival of the future will shape the world and its history into an unrealistic reality for technology and society.  Each year technology becomes more complex making robots more intelligent. This creates the idea that in 2100, robots will be smart enough to adapt human traits both good and bad. This particularly isn’t a good idea because they are more stronger and can easily determinate our world and destroy us along with it. 
The idea of robots becoming more intelligent and will have a Cybernetic revolt because they’re being oppressed by humans.  It is a statistic that, “Social development will rise twice as much between now and 2050 ”(Morris 2010). Also,  “By 2100 we can also anticipate cities of 140 million people, which is an estimate overpopulation of the continents”(Morris, Oct 2010). The earth will be over populated, creating an army of cybernetic people, which also can manually make the world last for million of years. Poverty will increase because there aren’t enough resources to go around and make everybody jobs. Instead robots will be doing all the work while many are homeless.
 The US Defense Advanced research Projects Agency (DARPA) The People who bought us the internet in the 70s is currently working on molecular scale computers built from enzymes and DNA molecules rather than silicon.  It is said that, “Computers will be built in DNA molecules making them more intelligent and precise perfection” (Future thinking, November 2012). A human walking around with computers in their DNA is very unrealistic and even going as far as turning them into robots. It’s going against human nature and actually giving robots more control. Building or creating a DNA makes us inhuman and that is a negative factor to nature and the meaning of life.
Another idea is that, ”Nanotechnology will turn everyday materials into deadly weapons in order to defend people but in an extreme way. “These will be implanted in soldiers heads giving post-biological infantry men some of the advantages of machines by speeding up their thought process, adding memory and even providing wireless internet”. Kurzweil argues that the exponential rise in computing power we see today will continue to a point where in 2029, machines will be as smart as people. At that point, he says, people will inevitably begin to use technology in new ways, implanting powerful devices that augment our abilities”( Kurzweil, Mar 23 2009). Many fear that technology will control us and procreate our human bodies. The idea of implanting chips in soldiers speeding up their thought process takes away characteristics of being human. Society will be able to genetically engineer their own ideal off-springs opposed to living nature as God intended.  
Conclusion:
Overall I believe that the government will not let technology rule the planet. Their purpose of improving technology is to make labor and life easier for all. There are pros and cons to technology, not only will it make life easier but it will also replace employees and workers causing them to loose jobs
Works Cited:
 

Future Thinking,Will men and machines merge?, www.bbc.com, November 2012 http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20121108-will-men-and-machines-merge

Ian Morris, Your children will live to see man merged with machines. But will it save or destroy us? dailymail.com, October 2010.

Ray Kurzweil, The coming Merging of Mind and Machine, www.scientificamerican.com, Mar 23 2009,http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/merging-of-mind-and-machine/